Acanthocystis dresscheri

Acanthocystis dresscheri  Siemensma & Roijackers, 1988

Diagnosis: Cell diameter 20 µm. Spine-scales 7.3-10.3 µm long, with a straight, cylindrical, hollow shaft, 0.5 -0.7 µm in diameter, centrally set on a circular basal plate. The apex of the shaft is slightly expanded, 0.6-0.8 µm in diameter, with 5-8 marginal sharply pointed teeth, each ca. 0.13 µm long. The basal plate is 1.4-2.2 µm in diameter, flat, with an upwardly bent rim, ca. 0.14 µm thick. The plate-scales are 4.7-5.5 x 2.3-3.0 µm, having concave sides with the median constriction 1.5-2.4 µm wide; the upper surface is ornamented with a distinct pattern of numerous small granules, more or less irregularly distributed, sometimes arranged in concentric rows; central area smooth with a slight indication of a longitudinal thickening. The lower surface is smooth with a protrusive axial rod-shaped thickening, distinctly separated from the scale surface and only at both ends merging into the scale. The protrusion is 0.43 µm thick and ca. 1.3 µm long.

Remarks: The protrusion on the lower side of the plate-scales is the most remarkable feature of this species. A. dresscheri shows some similarity with A. longiseta Penard, 1901, diagnosed as having rod-like or irregular plate-scales (Penard, 1904). It is not unlikely that Penard mistook the rod-like protrusion, present in plate-scales of A. dresscheri, for the whole plate-scale, as indicated by Siemensma (1981: plate 41 E, F). The main distinction between these two species is the presence of spine-scales of the same length (A. longiseta) and of short and long spine-scales (A. dresscheri). The diagnosis of A. longiseta was changed by Penard (1905 a, b), by describing the plate-scales as elliptical and without any longitudinal thickening, which indicates the problems of distinguishing among species by light microscopy.
A. dresscheri has been recognised in samples taken from a moorland pool (pH 5.5) near Nunspeet, the Netherlands. The samples are from the collection of the late Mr. Th. Dresscher, who identified the specimens as Acanthocystis penardi, not knowing the characteristic ultrastructure. Siemensma (1981) collected this species from similar locations in the Netherlands, but included A. dresscheri in his LM-description of A. penardi.

Recent posts

Cryptodifflugia collum

Cryptodifflugia collum, after Chardez, 1971 Cryptodifflugia collum  (Chardez, 1971) Bobrov et Mazei, 2017 Difflugiella collum Chardez, 1971 Diagnosis: Shell globose, transparent, hyaline, chitinous, aperture topped

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia brevicolla

Cryptodifflugia brevicolla, after Golemansky, 1979 Cryptodifflugia brevicolla  Golemansky, 1979 Diagnosis: Shell ovate, laterally compressed, with clearly expressed chitinous collar around an aperture, neck circular in

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia bassini

Cryptodifflugia bassini, after Bobrov, 2001 Cryptodifflugia bassini  Bobrov, 2001 Diagnosis: Shell small, axially symmetrical, circular in transverse section, flattened in longitudinal section, widely elliptical. Aperture

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia apiculata

Cryptodifflugia apiculata, after Cash, 1904 Cryptodifflugia apiculata  (Cash, 1904) Page, 1966 Difflugiella apiculata  Cash, 1904 Diagnosis: Shell ovoid, not compressed laterally, chitinous, smooth, transparent, colorless,

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia angusta

Cryptodifflugia angusta, after Schönborn, 1965 Cryptodifflugia angusta  (Schönborn, 1965) Page, 1966 Difflugiella angusta  Schönborn, 1965 Diagnosis: Shell small, organic, elongated-ovate, not transparent, yellow-brown, covered with

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia angulata

Cryptodifflugia angulata, after Playfair Cryptodifflugia angulata Playfair, 1917 Diagnosis: Shell small, oval, transparent, lateral sides flattened, fundus rounded-conic, widest shell part in the middle, lateral

Read More »