world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Acanthocystis clavata
From Siemensma, 1991

Acanthocystis tubata Dürrschmidt, 1987

Diagnosis: Periplast, ca. 25 µm in diameter, with two types of siliceous scales. Details of protoplast unknown. Plate scales ovoid or elliptical, 2.9-3.7 µm long and 2.2 µm wide, patternless, except for an axial thickening. Spine scales, 6-11 µm long and 0.23 µm wide at the narrowest point. Shaft cylindrical, gradually expanding towards the distal end. Apex, 0.4 µm in dia­meter, covered by a thin siliceous layer. A circle of about 12 conical teeth surrounds the apical margin. Base of the shaft supported by a circular, centrally depressed base­plate (diameter 1.2 µm) with peripheral rim.

Ecology: Surface sample collected 1982 in a swamp near Maramaranui, North Island, New Zealand.

Remarks: Dürrschmidt: A. tubata specimens reveal in the light microscope a striking similarity to A. mimetica Penard (1904), in the gradually expanded spine scale shafts, their circular base-plates and the dimensions of cells and scales. The only feature which contradicts an identification with A. mimetica is the absence of a conspicuous horse­shoe-like rim reported by Penard from the surface of the plate scales. Such a ‘rim’ appears sometimes during the LM observation of uneven structured plate scales, especially when these are somewhat tilted. Those scales are present, for instance in A. rotundata Nicholls ssp. rotoairense and A. pantopodeoides Nicholls (syn. A. cuneiformis Dürrschmidt. Thus it is assumed to be only an optical effect. However, the plate scales of A. tubata are flat. As no type material has been left by Penard, as inquiries at the following institutes revealed (British Museum, London; Museum D’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva; The Royal Microscopical Society, London; Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris) it will remain unclear on which specimens Penard based the diagnosis of A. mimetica.

A. tubata is easily recognized under the electron microscope by the shape of the spine scales. No variation in scale structure has been observed in specimens from different localities.

Recent posts

Sphenoderia compressa

Sphenoderia compressa, after Badewitz, 2002 Sphenoderia compressa Badewitz, 2002 Diagnosis: Test ovoid, oval in cross section, hyaline, covered with relatively small, oval, rather irregularly arranged

Read More »

Tracheleuglypha elongata

T. elongata, A-C after Thomas and Gauthier-Lièvre, 1959; D after Van Oye, 1959 Tracheleuglypha elongata Van Oye, 1959 Diagnosis: Test similar to T. dentata, but

Read More »

Tracheleuglypha acolla

T. acolla, after Bonnet and Thomas, 1960 Tracheleuglypha acolla Bonnet and Thomas, 1955 Diagnosis: Test ovoid, non compressed, round in cross-section, with large oval overlapping

Read More »

Cyclopyxis kahli oblonga

C. kahli f. oblonga , after Tarnogradskii, 1959 Cyclopyxis kahli f. oblonga  (Tarnogradskii, 1959) Centropyxis kahli f. oblonga Tarnogradskii, 1959 Diagnosis:  Test with all the

Read More »

Cyclopyxis leclercqi

Cyclopyxis leclercqi – from Beyens and Chardez, 1986 Cyclopyxis leclercqi Beyens and Chardez, 1986 Diagnosis: Shell circular in apertural view, dorso-ventrally compressed with a swollen

Read More »

Haplomyxa saranae

Haplomyxa saranae Dellinger, 2014 Diagnosis: cell body from small rounded (0.1 mm) to large elongated shape (up to 3.5 x 0.3 mm), usually flat but

Read More »