world of amoeboid organisms

Centropyxis thailandica
C. thailandica, after Todorov and Golemansky, 1999

Centropyxis thailandica  Todorov et Golemansky, 1999

Diagnosis: Test large, brown, a type of plagiostomy with a visor. In ventral and dorsal views it is ovoid. Aperture large, ovoid and sub-terminal. In lateral view a constriction clearly separates the spherical body from a strongly flattened visor. Flattened ventral side is well differentiated. Inner lip of the aperture feebly curved inside, outer lip incurvate forming a strongly flattened visor. Test surface on the ventral side usually smooth, composed mainly of small siliceous particles, embedded in yellow-brown organic cement. Test surface on the dorsal side rough, usually composed of bigger quartz particles of various sizes. A few very large quartz particles are visible on the posterior extremity on the dorsal side.

Dimensions: Length of test: 233-260 µm, width: 190-212 µm, height: 130-140 µm, diameter of the aperture: 110-117 µm.

Ecology: humid epiphytic mosses on tree trunks, height 1-2 m, Thailand, “Khao Yai” National Park.

Remarks: C. thailandica is easily distinguished from the remaining known species of the genus Centropyxis by its biometric characteristics. By its general form this big species resembles only Centropyxis ventricosa Bartos, 1963. C. thailandica differs from the other known species by the larger shell dimensions. Bartos (1963) indicated an average length of 100 µm and an average breadth about 63 µm for C. ventricosa, whereas the same dimensions of C. thailandica were 243 pm and 190 pm, respectively, i.e. almost three times larger. Furthermore, these species are also distinguished from each other by the structure of the visor. The visor of C. ventricosa is composed of two ranges of angular quartz particles and its outer lip is indented, whereas the visor of C. thailandica is composed by many small siliceous particles and its outer lip is not indented (Todorov and Golemansky, 1999).

Recent posts


K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »


P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »