Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Squamamoeba japonica – from Kudryavtsev and Pawlowski (2013)

Evosea Kang et al. 2017

Representatives of this clade can vary across almost the entire range of morphologies seen in Amoebozoa. Many members have complex life cycles that include amoeboid, ciliated and fruiting stages. Some species appear to be exclusively ciliated with no amoeboid features. Most taxa with only a subset of these life cycle stages.

The name Evosa was proposed by Kang et al. (2017) for a clade that contains the well-supported sub-clades Cutosea, Archamoebae, Eumycetozoa, and Variosea. They demonstrated that Cutosea belongs within this group and not within Lobosa. Evosea corresponds, more or less, with the traditional Conosa plus the Cutosea. Conosa is morphologically defined as having taxa with flagella, while Cutosea is devoid of flagellated taxa. Cutosea is represented by Sapocribrum, Squamamoeba, amoebae covered with very small scales.

The group that contains myxogastrids, dictyostelids, and protosporangiids is renamed Eumycetozoa.

In protosteloid evoseans, sex is sometimes thought to be associated with life cycles that include amoeboflagellates that germinate from spores and precede the development of nonflagellate obligate amoebae that subsequently produce the sporocarps

Reference:
Kang, S., Tice, A.K., Spiegel, F.W., Silberman, J.D., Pánek, T., Čepička, I., Kostka, M., Kosakyan, A., Alcântara, D.M., Roger, A.J., Shadwick, L.L., Smirnov, A., Kudryavstev, A., Lahr, D.J.G.,Brown, M.W. 2017. Between a pod and a hard test: the deep evolution of amoebae. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34: 2258-2270.

Recent posts

Kibisidytes

K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »

Phaeobola

P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »