Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea (left) compared with other species to show its size

Difflugia gigantea Schlumberger, 1845

Diagnose: test ovoid, elongated, narrowed anteriorly, almost pyriform, sometimes slightly depressed; covered with large grains of sand forming irregular projections; this species resembles Difflugia pyriformis, but it differs in its more elongated form and in its greater size.

Dimensions: Schlumberger: 168 – 483 µm (see remarks about his unit below). My measurements: length 322 – 554 µm.

Ecology: Freshwater, in sediment of mesotrophic waterpools, and between sphagnum.

Remarks: The name “gigantea” was used by Didier Chardez in a publication (1967) where he introduced, in his words, “Difflugia oblonga v. gigantea LEIDY, Thèque semblable à l’espèce, mais plus grande, 450 à 580 µ” (= Test resembling the type, but much larger, 450 to 580 µm), without any further comment or reference to a specific date, description or drawing of Joseph Leidy. This variety was elevated to species status by Ogden and Fairman (1979). In 1984 Chardez, probably unaware of the Ogden and Fairman publication, also ranked his variety to species status, now referring to the test of 580 µm on Plate X, fig. 15 in Leidy, 1879. However, the name gigantea had already been used, and therefore preoccupied, by Schlumberger in 1845, who described his Difflugia gigantea as follows:

Translated:

Animal with brownish-blue test, as if covered with large grains of sand forming irregular projections; ovoid, elongated, narrowed anteriorly. Length 0.08 to 0.23; greatest width, 0.036 to 0.05. This species resembles Difflugia proteiformis, Ehrb.; but it differs in its more elongated form (narrowed in front, almost pyriform, sometimes slightly depressed) and in its greater size. Pseudostome circular, with irregular edge, gives passage to three or four thick and obtuse cylindrical pseudopodia, thick, which in contraction, are covered with small bulges.

It is not clear which unit of measurement was used by Schlumberger. Perhaps “lines”, as in some older texts. A line is 1/12 of an inch, so .08 would be 169 micrometres. In that case his shells were 168-483 µm long and 75-105 µm broad.

If he used the French “ligne”, based on the French inch, so the conversion is a little different. A “ligne” is 2.2558291 mm, so roughly the shells are 180-518 µm. However, I don’t have any idea whether it is plausible that Schlumberger would be using that unit in 1845. It seems rather late, for someone writing in French!

It is not likely that he used millimeters as measurement, because that would mean that his tests were 80-230 µm, not quite a reason to call this species “gigantea”.

Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea: this comparison shows how problematic the subject is. a Test 550 µm (Netherlands), which is probably what Schlumberger meant with “almost pyriformis”; b Test labeled by Ogden as D. gigantea Chardez, 1967 (from Mazei and Warren, 2014) 380 µm c This drawing from Leidy, 1879, was used by Chardez for describing his var. gigantea; e Drawing of this variety by Chardez (1967).

There is no clear match between the shells of Leidy, Chardez and Ogden. Chardez gives two different sizes, the measurements published in 1967 are different from those published in 1984. Ogdens shell strongly resembles test a.

Following dimensions given for D. gigantea sensu Chardez, 1967 and Ogden and Fairman, 1979: Chardez (1967): 450 – 580 µm; Chardez (1984): length 450 – 462 µm; Ogden and Fairman (1979): 341 – 480 µm; Lahr & Lopes (2006): 180 – 280 µm.

The name D. gigantea (Chardez, 1967) Ogden et Fairman, 1979 is not valid.

Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea, 415, 385 and 362 µm long
Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea, 414, 325, 380 and 453 µm long; the test to the right is D. pyriformis.
Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea – 325 µm long, with zoochlorellae
Difflugia gigantea
Difflugia gigantea, 414 µm long. From a dune lake, the Netherlands
Recent posts

Pelomyxa video

Pelomyxa palustris Pelomyxa palustris, found below decaying leaves in the hollow of a beech Pelomyxa palustris, found below decaying leaves in the hollow of a

Read More »

Hoogenraadia galeata

H. galeata – from Stepanek, 1963 Hoogenraadia galeata  (Stepanek, 1963) n. comb. Gillardella galeata Stepanek, 1963 Diagnosis: Shell somewhat similar to the shell of Corythion dubium

Read More »

Arcella grospietschi

Arcella grospietschi, after Stepanek, 1963 Arcella grospietschi  Stepanek, 1963 Diagnosis: Shell disc-shaped, yellow-brown, in ventral view with a undulated border, with seven large and seven smaller

Read More »

Arcella oyei

Arcella oyei, after Stepanek, 1963 Arcella oyei  Stepanek, 1963 Diagnosis: In dorsal view, the shell is circular, with 10 apparent broken lobes on the surface. In

Read More »

Centropyxis halophila

C. halophila, after Bonnet, 1959 Centropyxis halophila Bonnet, 1959 Diagnosis: Shell with ovoid sole, extended by a rather strongly covering visor and not clearly separated

Read More »

Euglypha cuspidata

Euglypha cuspidata Euglypha cuspidata  Bonnet, 1959 Diagnosis: Shell small, very transparent, ovoid, in lateral view very elliptical, with sharp edges. Pseudostome small, elliptical, surrounded by a

Read More »