world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Euglypha cabrolae
4 Eugypha rotunda var. minor: apertural scale (5) and detail of the test (6); 7 Euglypha hyalina: apertural scale (8) and detail of the test (9); 10 Euglypha capsiosa: apertural scales (11-12) and detail of the test (13) – after Coûteaux, 1978

Euglypha hyalina Coûteaux, 1978

Diagnosis: Test ovoid, little or no compressed. Number of apertural scales 8 to 10, scales hexagon-shaped, the largest width is half the length. On the inner side, a median hook at the tip of the scale, two (exceptionnally three) pairs of side hooks on its front quarter. The length/width ratio is between 1.00 and 1.54. All hooks are pulled outwards and forwards. Scales of the theca: 8 to 10 rows visible in width, 5 to 6 in length, diamond-shaped. Dimensions (out of 9 specimens): Length of the theca: 18.5-27.9 microns (median: 24.4 microns). Width of the theca: 9.4-16.4 microns (median: 12.7 microns). Length of mouth scales: 2.3-4.1 microns (median: 3.6 microns). Width of oral scales: 1.8-3.2, microns (median: 2.8 microns). Flake length: 3.8-4.9 microns (median: 4.4 microns). Scale width: 1.8-2.9 microns (median: 2.3 microns). Remarks: this species differs from Euglypha rotunda var. minor by the shape of the distal end of the apertural scales which is pointed and not finger-shaped elongated, by the more anterior position of the hooks and by the diamond-like shape of the scales of the theca.

Dimensions: (n=9) Test length: 23.9-35.7 µm (mean 29.5 µm); width: 11.7-20.4 µm (mean 17.7 µm). Apertural scales: length 3.7-5.0 µm (mean 4.5 µm), width 2.2-3.4 µm (mean 2.5 µm). Scales: length: 3.2-5.7 µm (mean 4.3 µm), width: 2.1-3.2 µm (mean 2.5 µm).

Ecology: Soil, forest. Japan.

Remarks: Remarks: this species differs from Euglypha rotunda var. minor by the shape of the distal end of the apertural scales which is pointed and not finger-shaped elongated, by the more anterior position of the hooks and by the diamond-like shape of the scales of the theca.
1) for the test: size and the number of rows of scales in length and width;
2) for the oral scales: the length, the length/width ratio, the location of the widest width, the presence or absence of a finger-shaped structure at the distal end, the presence or absence of a thickening at the proximal end.
Those who are common to them are:
1) for the test: the length/width ratio, the uncompressed character;
2) for the apertural scales: the width, the presence of hooks;
3) for the scales of the test: size.

Literature: Coûteaux, M., 1978. Quelques Thécamoebiens du sol de Japon. Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol, 15:1:119-128.

Recent posts

Yogsothoth knorrus

Yogsothoth knorrus, after Shishkin and Zlatogursky, 2018 Yogsothoth knorrus Shishkin and Zlatogursky, 2018 Diagnosis: Individual cells in colony have a diameter of 5.53-13.26 µm; they

Read More »

Yogsothothidae

Yogsothoth carteri, from Shishkin and Zlatogursky, 2018 Yogsothothidae  Shishkin and Zlatogursky, 2018 Diagnosis: Centrohelids covered with two types of tangentially-oriented plate-scales, having a different morphology.

Read More »

Acanthocystis dürrschmidtidae

A. dürrschmidtidae – after Wujek, 2003 Acanthocystis dürrschmidtidae  Wujek, 2003 Diagnosis: Cells 35-40 µm (based on a whole mount). Periplast comprising scales of two types, plate

Read More »

Centroplasthelida

Centroplasthelida Febvre-Chevalier and Febvre, 1984   Diagnosis: Phagotrophic and non-photosynthetic protists with one large spherical or near spherical centrosome at the center of the cell

Read More »

Pterocystida

  Pterocystida Cavalier-Smith and Heyden, 2007 stat. n.   Phylogenetic diagnosis: The least inclusive clade, containing Pterocystis devonica, Raphidiophrys heterophryoidea and Choanocystis curvata, but not Acanthocystis

Read More »

Panacanthocystida

Panacanthocystida Shishkin et Zlatogursky, 2018   Diagnosis: Centrohelids usually covered with siliceous scales or with organic spicules: scale-bearing species with both inner plate-scales and outer

Read More »