Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Familiy Oxnerellidae Cavalier-smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: Naked centrohelids, lacking scales, spicules or mucus coat; axopodia either radiating from the centrosome in all directions or appressed to substratum. Extrusomes conspicuous.
Type genus: Oxnerella Dobell 1917.

Oxnerella micra Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: tiny naked centrohelid heliozoan with extremely slender axopodia with prominent extrusomes; axopodia are normally stretched across the substratum.
Differs from the only previously named type species O. maritima by smaller size (~7 µm not 10-22 µm) and by the many fewer axopodia (6 or 7) lying along the substratum during feeding and by feeding on bacteria not algae.
Type locality: muddy coastal marine sand, Walney Island, Cumbria, UK.

Remarks: Oxnerella micra cells are so small that the nucleus and centrosome are both hard to identify in the presence of ingested bacteria. The only clearly distinguishing features are the long slender axopodia, which do not radiate in all directions as in the much larger Oxnerella maritima (Dobell 1917) but extend along the substratum in much the same way as in many of the smaller granofilosean Cercozoa (Bass et al. 2009). The large prominent extrusomes are the easiest way of differentiating them from the similarly sized marine granofilosean Minimassisteria (Howe et al. 2011), which has much smaller extrusomes that are far less obvious. Minimassisteria also differs by having a flagellate phase (as does the related Massisteria) and an ability to extrude relatively thick pseudopodia, but neither of these features is always expressed. Chlamydaster fimbriatus also spreads its axopodia on the substratum like O. micra when feeding, but is readily distinguished by its substantially larger size and conspicuous fimbriated mucus coat (Dürrschmidt and Patterson 1987). No signs of a mucus coat, scales, cilia, contractile vacuoles, cysts or pseudopodia were visible in O. micra. Young cells of the granofilosean Limnofila with unbranched pseudopods could easily be confused with O. micra (though all known Limnofila species are from freshwater) as they are about the same size, their filopodia have the same thinness, and extrusomes are essentially the same size as in O. micra, but most limnofilids have obviously branching filopodia. The marine Nanofila is smaller with tinier extrusomes and should not be confusable with O. micra (Bass et al. 2009; Bhattacharya and Oliveira 2000). The noncentrohelid heliozoan Microheliella is also smaller and its extrusomes are too small to be clearly detected by light microscopy (Yabuki et al. 2012), so is obviously distinct. O. micra is thus distinguishable in the light microscope from all previously named protists. (Remarks by Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012)

Recent posts

Centropyxis tropica

C. tropica, after Deflandre, 1929 Centropyxis tropica  Deflandre, 1929 Basionym: Centropyxis aculeata var. tropica Deflandre, 1929 Diagnosis: As for C. aculeata, but with much longer

Read More »

Centropyxis nauwercki

Centropyxis nauwercki, after Schönborn, 1975 Centropyxis nauwercki  Schönborn, 1975 Diagnosis: Shell divided by a ring groove into a highly convex, balloon-shaped fundus part and a

Read More »

Centropyxis pontifera

Centropyxis pontifera, after Bartos, 1963 Centropyxis pontifera  Bartos, 1963 Diagnosis: Test large, broadly oval, formed of a thick, solid, brownish-yellow organic matter. Test with many

Read More »

Centropyxis pyriformis

Centropyxis pyriformis, after Van Oye, 1958 Centropyxis pyriformis  Van Oye, 1958 Diagnosis: This species is distinguished from C. aculeata by its narrowed shape towards the

Read More »

Centropyxis dentistoma

Centropyxis dentistoma, after Decloitre, 1949 Centropyxis dentistoma  Decloitre, 1949 Basionym: Centropyxis aculeata var. dentistoma Decloitre, 1949 Diagnosis: Pseudostome lobed, with 4 to 7 sharp teeth,

Read More »

Centropyxis compressa

Centropyxis compressa, after Van Oye, 1948 Centropyxis compressa  Van Oye, 1948 Diagnosis: Test a little elongated and very flattened regularly, like that of Arcella discoides;

Read More »

Centropyxis lata

Centropyxis lata, after Jung, 1942 Centropyxis lata  Jung, 1942 Diagnosis: Shell coarse-scaled, covered with a mix of diatoms and detritus; pseudostome large, ventral side mostly

Read More »

Centropyxis aurita

Centropyxis aurita, after Laminger, 1973 Centropyxis aurita  Laminger, 1973 Diagnosis: In ventral view, the shell is more or less broadly ovoid in outline. Quite straight truncated

Read More »

Centropyxis grelli

Centropyxis grelli, after Laminger, 1973 Centropyxis grelli  Laminger, 1973 Diagnosis: Shell covered with relatively large mineral particles. The pseudostome outline is formed by two convex arches.

Read More »

Centropyxis adami

Centropyxis adami, after Laminger, 1971 Centropyxis adami  Laminger, 1971 Diagnosis: In ventral view, the outline of the shell is more or less elliptical, in side

Read More »