world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Genus Microheliella Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: As for the order Microhelida.

 

Microheliella maris Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: Characters of the genus; cell body about 4 µm, axopodia about twice that but so slender that easily overlooked.

Ecology: brackish habitat. River Ebro Delta, Spain

Remarks: Microheliella maris is so small that it is hard to see morphological characteristics under the light microscope, but it can be recognized by four:

1) radiating axopodia,
2) central centrosome,
3) the nucleus situated aside from the cell centre,
4) absence of cilia.

This morphological combination is shared only with centrohelid heliozoa and gymnosphaerids; in the light microscope alone one cannot see their tiny extrusomes and cannot tell that the axopodia actually have microtubules, as shown here for the first time. Gymnosphaerids are far larger, more complicated and adaptively quite distinct; none of those known could be confused with Microheliella. It would be hard to separate Microheliella from the smallest scale-free centrohelids (Oxnerella, Chlamydaster); the smallest of these so far described is typically three times as large as Microheliella, but there is a new species of Oxnerella which is nearly as small (7 µm as opposed to Microheliella’s 4 µm (Chao and Cavalier-Smith, unpubl. observ.). It can be distinguished from Microheliella by careful light microscopy that reveals its much larger and more obvious extrusomes (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012).

Similar looking amoeboids are specimens of the genus Limnofila, which are also very small, but lack microtubules.

Recent posts

Sphenoderia compressa

Sphenoderia compressa, after Badewitz, 2002 Sphenoderia compressa Badewitz, 2002 Diagnosis: Test ovoid, oval in cross section, hyaline, covered with relatively small, oval, rather irregularly arranged

Read More »

Tracheleuglypha elongata

T. elongata, A-C after Thomas and Gauthier-Lièvre, 1959; D after Van Oye, 1959 Tracheleuglypha elongata Van Oye, 1959 Diagnosis: Test similar to T. dentata, but

Read More »

Tracheleuglypha acolla

T. acolla, after Bonnet and Thomas, 1960 Tracheleuglypha acolla Bonnet and Thomas, 1955 Diagnosis: Test ovoid, non compressed, round in cross-section, with large oval overlapping

Read More »

Cyclopyxis kahli oblonga

C. kahli f. oblonga , after Tarnogradskii, 1959 Cyclopyxis kahli f. oblonga  (Tarnogradskii, 1959) Centropyxis kahli f. oblonga Tarnogradskii, 1959 Diagnosis:  Test with all the

Read More »

Cyclopyxis leclercqi

Cyclopyxis leclercqi – from Beyens and Chardez, 1986 Cyclopyxis leclercqi Beyens and Chardez, 1986 Diagnosis: Shell circular in apertural view, dorso-ventrally compressed with a swollen

Read More »

Haplomyxa saranae

Haplomyxa saranae Dellinger, 2014 Diagnosis: cell body from small rounded (0.1 mm) to large elongated shape (up to 3.5 x 0.3 mm), usually flat but

Read More »