Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Genus Microheliella Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: As for the order Microhelida.

 

Microheliella maris Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012

Diagnosis: Characters of the genus; cell body about 4 µm, axopodia about twice that but so slender that easily overlooked.

Ecology: brackish habitat. River Ebro Delta, Spain

Remarks: Microheliella maris is so small that it is hard to see morphological characteristics under the light microscope, but it can be recognized by four:

1) radiating axopodia,
2) central centrosome,
3) the nucleus situated aside from the cell centre,
4) absence of cilia.

This morphological combination is shared only with centrohelid heliozoa and gymnosphaerids; in the light microscope alone one cannot see their tiny extrusomes and cannot tell that the axopodia actually have microtubules, as shown here for the first time. Gymnosphaerids are far larger, more complicated and adaptively quite distinct; none of those known could be confused with Microheliella. It would be hard to separate Microheliella from the smallest scale-free centrohelids (Oxnerella, Chlamydaster); the smallest of these so far described is typically three times as large as Microheliella, but there is a new species of Oxnerella which is nearly as small (7 µm as opposed to Microheliella’s 4 µm (Chao and Cavalier-Smith, unpubl. observ.). It can be distinguished from Microheliella by careful light microscopy that reveals its much larger and more obvious extrusomes (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2012).

Similar looking amoeboids are specimens of the genus Limnofila, which are also very small, but lack microtubules.

Recent posts

Kibisidytes

K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »

Phaeobola

P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »