Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

How to identify amoebae?

 

The user should not expect that every amoeba of a described species will have a form fitting into the illustrated one.

Fred C. Page, 1976

Identifying an amoeba may be a big problem. Unless you are a very experienced observer, it is nearly impossible to determine the family or genus of an amoeba based on a single observation. The problem is that amoebae do not have a constant body form, they are polymorphic. A single cell can have different shapes, especially when it is stationary or moves in a non-coordinated manner, often changing the direction of locomotion. Though most amoebae do not have stable morphological characters that could be easily described, there are some light microscopical characteristics which can be used for identification and describing species:

1   general pattern and outline of a moving amoeba;
2   presence and shape of pseudopodia and subpseudopodia;
3   organization of the uroid;
4   shape of an amoeba in cross-section;
5   position of the hyaloplasm in the locomotive cell;
6   cystforming and structure of the cyst;
7   structure of the nucleus.

The locomotive form is possibly the most useful characteristic. Smirnov et al (1999, 2004) distinguish a number of morphotypes, which are useful to determinate families and genera. The system of morphotypes is not a taxonomic classification.
For further information see the excellent guide to the morphology and identification of naked amoebae:

Smirnov, A. V., Brown, S. (2004): Guide to the study and identification of soil amoebae. Protistology 3:148-190.

Recent posts

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »

Zivkovicia compressoidea

Z. compressoidea, a-b after Chardez, 1958; c after Jung, 1942 Zivkovicia compressoidea  (Jung, 1942) new.comb. Basionym: Pontigulasia compressoidea Jung, 1942 Diagnosis: Shell ovoid and compressed,

Read More »

Zivkovicia flexa

Z. flexa, from Cash and Hopkinson, 1909 Zivkovicia flexa  (Cash and Hopkinson, 1909) Ogden, 1983 Basionym: Pontigulasia compressa var. flexa  Cash and Hopkinson, 1909 Diagnosis:

Read More »