Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

How to identify amoebae?

 

The user should not expect that every amoeba of a described species will have a form fitting into the illustrated one.

Fred C. Page, 1976

Identifying an amoeba may be a big problem. Unless you are a very experienced observer, it is nearly impossible to determine the family or genus of an amoeba based on a single observation. The problem is that amoebae do not have a constant body form, they are polymorphic. A single cell can have different shapes, especially when it is stationary or moves in a non-coordinated manner, often changing the direction of locomotion. Though most amoebae do not have stable morphological characters that could be easily described, there are some light microscopical characteristics which can be used for identification and describing species:

1   general pattern and outline of a moving amoeba;
2   presence and shape of pseudopodia and subpseudopodia;
3   organization of the uroid;
4   shape of an amoeba in cross-section;
5   position of the hyaloplasm in the locomotive cell;
6   cystforming and structure of the cyst;
7   structure of the nucleus.

The locomotive form is possibly the most useful characteristic. Smirnov et al (1999, 2004) distinguish a number of morphotypes, which are useful to determinate families and genera. The system of morphotypes is not a taxonomic classification.
For further information see the excellent guide to the morphology and identification of naked amoebae:

Smirnov, A. V., Brown, S. (2004): Guide to the study and identification of soil amoebae. Protistology 3:148-190.

Recent posts

Penardochlamys arcelloides

P. arcelloides – after Penard, 1904 Penardochlamys arcelloides  (Penard, 1904) Deflandre, 1953 Diagnosis: Colorless or very slightly yellowish envelope, bag or cauldron-shaped, very thin, chitinous,

Read More »

Reticulomyxa hannae

R. hannae, plasmodium – photomicrograph Steffen Clauss Reticulomyxa hannae Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites surrounded by a very thin mucous envelope, with slowly moving plasmodia, variable

Read More »

Velamentofex saxonensis

V. saxonensis, feeding (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex saxonensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 30-95 μm, granuloreticulopodia up to 1000 μm long. with a hyaline, thin

Read More »

Velamentofex tyrolensis

V. tyrolensis (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex tyrolensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 98-125 μm, with reticulopodia up to 300 μm long, with a hyaline,

Read More »

Velamentofex berolinensis

V. berolinensis Velamentofex berolinensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 50-300 µm, with a hyaline, extremely flexible, membranous test. Nuclei numerous, 11.6-16.2 µm in diameter,

Read More »

Lieberkuehniidae

 Lieberkuehniidae  Siemensma, Holzmann, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, Clauß, Voelcker, Bettighofer, Khanipour Roshan, Walden, Dumack and Pawlowski, 2020 Diagnosis: Multinucleate organic-walled monothalamous foraminifera. Test very flexible, elongated to broadly

Read More »