Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Hyalosphenia ovalis, 147 µm; notice the keel and the many pores (c. 10) – Haaksbergerveen, The Netherlands

Hyalosphenia ovalis Wailes, 1912

Diagnosis: shell colorless to light yellow or brown, transparent, completely organic; in shape resembling a pouch or the blade of an axe, smooth and laterally flattened; usually with two lateral pores, one on each side, in the upper part of the shell; depending upon environmental conditions, up to 13 pores may be present in the borders of the fundus; aperture terminal, a narrow slit, surrounded by a small collar; protoplasm not filling the shell but attached to the inner surface by epipodia, always containing zoochlorellae; pseudopods often numerous active

Dimensions: length 110-140 µm

Ecology: Sphagnum; swamps.

Remarks: Booth and Mayers (2010) suggest that H. papilio is identical with H. ovalis: “Although early descriptions separated H. ovalis from H. papilio by its larger size, more oval shape, and rounded keel, some recent peatland work has focused more on the pronounced convex tapering of the aperture in H. ovalis (Charman et al. 2000). However, using this criterion, tests identified as H. ovalis are generally smaller than H. papilio, which is inconsistent with early descriptions. In fact, even specimens of H. ovalis in Penard’s slides at the British museum would be classified as H. papilio if the convex tapering of the aperture were used as the primary diagnostic feature (Charman et al. 2000). To add to the confusion, individuals of Nebela tincta sometimes lack plates, as is common in some modern samples and most fossil samples, yet these would be identified as H. ovalis using the approach of Charman et al. (2000). N. tincta is generally smaller than H. papilio, and confusion between these taxa may help explain the smaller size of tests identified as H. ovalis in recent studies (Charman et al. 2000).”

Reference: Booth, R.K. and Meyers, B., 2010. Environmental Controls on Pore Number in Hyalosphenia papilio: Implications for Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction. Acta Protozool. 49: 29-35

Recent posts

Kibisidytes

K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »

Phaeobola

P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »