Hyalosphenia ovalis, 147 µm; notice the keel and the many pores (c. 10) – Haaksbergerveen, The Netherlands

Hyalosphenia ovalis Wailes, 1912

Diagnosis: shell colorless to light yellow or brown, transparent, completely organic; in shape resembling a pouch or the blade of an axe, smooth and laterally flattened; usually with two lateral pores, one on each side, in the upper part of the shell; depending upon environmental conditions, up to 13 pores may be present in the borders of the fundus; aperture terminal, a narrow slit, surrounded by a small collar; protoplasm not filling the shell but attached to the inner surface by epipodia, always containing zoochlorellae; pseudopods often numerous active

Dimensions: length 110-140 µm

Ecology: Sphagnum; swamps.

Remarks: Booth and Mayers (2010) suggest that H. papilio is identical with H. ovalis: “Although early descriptions separated H. ovalis from H. papilio by its larger size, more oval shape, and rounded keel, some recent peatland work has focused more on the pronounced convex tapering of the aperture in H. ovalis (Charman et al. 2000). However, using this criterion, tests identified as H. ovalis are generally smaller than H. papilio, which is inconsistent with early descriptions. In fact, even specimens of H. ovalis in Penard’s slides at the British museum would be classified as H. papilio if the convex tapering of the aperture were used as the primary diagnostic feature (Charman et al. 2000). To add to the confusion, individuals of Nebela tincta sometimes lack plates, as is common in some modern samples and most fossil samples, yet these would be identified as H. ovalis using the approach of Charman et al. (2000). N. tincta is generally smaller than H. papilio, and confusion between these taxa may help explain the smaller size of tests identified as H. ovalis in recent studies (Charman et al. 2000).”

Robert K. Booth and Blaze Meyers, Environmental Controls on Pore Number in Hyalosphenia papilio: Implications for Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction, Acta Protozool. (2010) 49: 29-35

Recent posts

Cryptodifflugia collum

Cryptodifflugia collum, after Chardez, 1971 Cryptodifflugia collum  (Chardez, 1971) Bobrov et Mazei, 2017 Difflugiella collum Chardez, 1971 Diagnosis: Shell globose, transparent, hyaline, chitinous, aperture topped

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia brevicolla

Cryptodifflugia brevicolla, after Golemansky, 1979 Cryptodifflugia brevicolla  Golemansky, 1979 Diagnosis: Shell ovate, laterally compressed, with clearly expressed chitinous collar around an aperture, neck circular in

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia bassini

Cryptodifflugia bassini, after Bobrov, 2001 Cryptodifflugia bassini  Bobrov, 2001 Diagnosis: Shell small, axially symmetrical, circular in transverse section, flattened in longitudinal section, widely elliptical. Aperture

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia apiculata

Cryptodifflugia apiculata, after Cash, 1904 Cryptodifflugia apiculata  (Cash, 1904) Page, 1966 Difflugiella apiculata  Cash, 1904 Diagnosis: Shell ovoid, not compressed laterally, chitinous, smooth, transparent, colorless,

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia angusta

Cryptodifflugia angusta, after Schönborn, 1965 Cryptodifflugia angusta  (Schönborn, 1965) Page, 1966 Difflugiella angusta  Schönborn, 1965 Diagnosis: Shell small, organic, elongated-ovate, not transparent, yellow-brown, covered with

Read More »

Cryptodifflugia angulata

Cryptodifflugia angulata, after Playfair Cryptodifflugia angulata Playfair, 1917 Diagnosis: Shell small, oval, transparent, lateral sides flattened, fundus rounded-conic, widest shell part in the middle, lateral

Read More »