Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Genus Luffisphaera  Belcher & Swale, 1975

Diagnoses: Cells spherical or elliptical, size range ca. 2.5-3.5 µm. Periplast covered with a single layer of hollow, lattice-work scales. The majority of these consist of a bowl-shaped lower part with a thickened base supporting a cylindrical, fusiform or dome-shaped outer portion. Some scales possess the basal part only. No cilia or basal bodies observed. Single large nucleus present.

Remarks: The nucleus occupies a large part of the cell. It has a conspicuous nucleolus and the double membrane of the wall is clearly visible. The mitochondria, several in each cell, contain microtubular cristae, and a Golgi apparatus and associated vesicles are always present. The cytoplasm contains numerous vesicles and channels of e.r. Several vacuoles which may be food vacuoles are also present, but no recog­nizable contents were seen. The cell membrane is often invaginated to form small channels, perhaps in connection with pinocytosis. There was no indication of either cilia or basal bodies.

The affinities of the organisms are obscure. They might be thought to be spores, but there are no signs of encapsulation and the content’s seem typical of active cells. Despite the apparent absence of cilia there is no evidence of pseudopodial production and the cells are presumably non-motile. Recent studies have shown a great diversity of scale structure among micro-organisms, but the only scales in the least resembling those of Luffisphaera are on Sphaleromantis tetragona Skuja (Manton & Harris 1966), a motile photosynthetic member of the Chrysophyceae or Chrysomonadida, Species of Luffisphaera may be widespread. They are not confined to freshwater since a cell apparently belonging to the group (and most like our form A) has been seen among the marine plankton off the Danish coast (Manton, in the press).

All from Belcher and Swale, 1975

Luffisphaera
a L. cucumiformis; b L. myosurus; c L. ampullacea; d L. lanceolata (from Belcher & Swale, 1975)
Recent posts

Kibisidytes

K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »

Phaeobola

P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »