Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Microcorycia bryophila
after Decloitre, 1974

Microcorycia bryophila Decloitre, 1974

Diagnosis: “This species bears a slight remembrance to Microcorycia tessellata Penard. The differences are as follows: With tessellata, the base of the theca is provided with five plates having unequal sides, straight or curved. With bryophila, the base of the theca is constituted by several almost pentagonal plates. When seen from above, the theca of bryophila shows a well opened pseudostome, slightly eccentrically located, and an upper part of the theca has some irregular dark spots that look like strange foreign particles stuck onto the theca, covered with some small circles that are defined by a slightly dark line. On the other hand, the theca of bryophila is circular” (Decloitre, 1974).

Dimensions: Decloitre (1974): Diameter 40 µm, height 30 µm, pseudostome 12-15 µm.

Ecology: Aerophilous mosses (Decloitre 1974), Antarctic moss(?) (Sudzuki 1979). Europe: France (Decloitre 1974), the Antarctic (?) (Sudzuki 1979).

Remarks: “The genus description becomes more intelligible in connection with Decloitre’s drawing (Fig. 3) if the adverbial phrases “from above” [French dessus] and “from below” [French dessous] are interpreted as the opposites. Then Fig. 3a (Decloitre Fig. 1) shows the ventral view, Fig. 3b (Decloitre Fig. 2) shows the dorsal view. In dorsal view, the upper test part of M. bryophila shows evidently stiffening ribs as a characteristic in reticular arrangement. Thus M. bryophila is within the range of variation of M. tessellata (see below). The second feature Decloitre stated, the covering of the lower test part with “dark spots” and “some small circles” is in my opinion no specific characteristic; presumably this is a random feature. The only rediscovery so far, which Sudzuki (1979) reported from the Antarctic, is marked as questionable in a species list. His added microphotographs did not dispel doubts. M. bryophila is therefore withdrawn.”

(all quotes from Badewitz, 2004)

Recent posts

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »

Zivkovicia compressoidea

Z. compressoidea, a-b after Chardez, 1958; c after Jung, 1942 Zivkovicia compressoidea  (Jung, 1942) new.comb. Basionym: Pontigulasia compressoidea Jung, 1942 Diagnosis: Shell ovoid and compressed,

Read More »

Zivkovicia flexa

Z. flexa, from Cash and Hopkinson, 1909 Zivkovicia flexa  (Cash and Hopkinson, 1909) Ogden, 1983 Basionym: Pontigulasia compressa var. flexa  Cash and Hopkinson, 1909 Diagnosis:

Read More »