Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Genus Paraluffisphaera Esteban et al., 2005

Diagnoses: Probably free-living protists, oval in shape and with the cell surface entirely covered with two types of scales:
(1) base scales that are elliptical, flat, and with a “closed” slit in the centre, and
(2) structures resembling the base scale whose slit is open to house a tubular structure.
With the present stage of knowledge, it is not clear whether the tubular structure is attached at its proximal end to the open base scale, or if it emerges from the slit opening. No flagella or similar swimming structures were observed. This diagnosis may change if further species of the genus are found.

Type species: Paraluffisphaera tuba Esteban et al., 2005

Differential diagnosis: There is no other described eukaryote such as Paraluffisphaera – and this alone justifies its erection as a new genus. The presence of two types of scales wrapping the cell surface resembles organisms of the genus Luffisphaera – hence the generic name Paraluffisphaera. However, the organisational level of Paraluffisphaera is far simpler than that of Luffisphaera. The base and the tubular scales of Paraluffisphaera lack the lattice network configuration of Luffisphaera. In the latter, the lattice structure is present in the basal and tubular scales. The structure of this lattice network is one of the characters used for the discrimination of species. As this character does not appear in Paraluffisphaera, the segregation of species is based on the shape of the base and/or tubular scales, e.g. base scale flat and elliptical, or cup-shaped, etc. Furthermore, in Paraluffisphaera the tubular scales do not sit on prominent basal scales, as in Luffisphaera. Finally, both basal and tubular scales of Paraluffisphaera lack the conspicuous rigidness of Luffisphaera scales.

 

Recent posts

Kibisidytes

K. marinus, after Jepps, 1934 Kibisidytes marinus Jepps, 1934 Diagnosis: Small amoeboid organism occurring in the sea, attached to the surface film or to some

Read More »

Phaeobola

P. aeris from Dumack et al., 2000 Phaeobola Dumack et al., 2000 Diagnosis: Cells roundish to oval shaped. Shell colorless to amber-colored, rough surface, few

Read More »

Rhizaspis armata

R. armata, 68 µm long, excl. spines – Laegieskamp Rhizaspis armata (Lauterborn, 1901) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Pamphagus armatum Lauterborn, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous,

Read More »

Rhizaspis spinosa

The original description with original drawings, Penard, 1890. Rhizaspis spinosa (Penard, 1890) Dumack et al., 2021 Basionym: Trinema spinosum Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Theca membranous, ovoid

Read More »

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”

Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis”, front and side view, 424 µm Difflugia “pseudoclaviformis” Diagnosis: Shell pyriform, compressed, with a more or less pronounced aboral protuberance; shell composed of

Read More »

Difflugia from Lolo Pass

Shells 461-448 µm, stacked image. I found this large en remarkable shells in sediment of a small mountain lake near Lolo Pass, Montana USA. It differs

Read More »

Foraminifer drome

Unknown species, collected from the river Drôme, France, 2021 Unknown species September 2021, I found about ten specimens of an agglutinated foraminifer in a sample

Read More »

Cyclopyxis spec

Cyclopyxis spec., 168 µm Cyclopyxis spec. Diagnosis: Shell circular in ventral and dorsal view, more or less hemispherical in lateral view (height/diameter ≈ 0.5); lateral

Read More »

Difflugia fallax

Difflugia fallax, from Penard, 1902 Difflugia fallax Penard, 1890 Diagnosis: Shell hyaline or yellowish-greenish, black at low magnification, round in cross section, formed of a

Read More »