Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu
Raphidiophrys elegans
From Siemensma, 1991

Raphidiophrys elegans Hertwig & Lesser, 1874 emend. Penard, 1904

Diagnosis: Scales nearly orbicular to broadly ovate, sometimes oblong; scales often more or less curved with the poles bended downwards; scales 6.2-8.6 x 4.4-6.5 µm with a L/B ratio usually 1.1-1.4, sometimes up to 2.0; scales with internal radial septa; number of septa along the border varying from 30 to 60 per 10 µm; edge of the scales strongly inflected.
Colonial forms show clusters of 2-27 individuals, though light microscopic mounts gave the impression that larger colonies might have broken in two or more sub-colonies, probably due to the transfer of the material by pipetting onto the slides. Colonial and solitary forms show no differentation in shape and structure of the scales.

Dimensions of the scales given by:
Penard (1904): 7.5-8 x 6-6.25 µm, L/B = 1.3,
Wailes (1921): 7-8 x 6 µm, L/B = 1.2,
Hovasse (1964): 7.5-8.0 x 6.0-6.4 µm, L/B =1.2, with a total number of ca. 100 septa along the rim,
Rainer (1968): ex icon.: 5.0-7.5 x 1.5 µm.

Remarks: Raphidiophrys orbicularis Nicholls, 1985, is considered a junior synonym of R. elegans. lts scales tend to be somewhat larger (6€”10 µn) but the L/B ratio is 1.1-1.2 (ex. icon.). The total number of septa along the rim varies from 84-96, which agrees with the report of Hovasse (1964).
Scales of R. elegans are distinguished from those R. minuta which lack a curved rim.
I collected this species both in Sweden and the Netherlands. It is rather common.

Raphidiophrys elegans
Colony of R. elegans
Raphidiophrys elegans
Raphidiophrys elegans, arrangement of scales around the base of axopodia.
Raphidiophrys elegans
Raphidiophrys elegans, solitary specimen with flat scales.
Raphidiophrys elegans
Raphidiophrys elegans, body 34 µm
Raphidiophrys elegans
Raphidiophrys cf. elegans, solitary form
Raphidiophrys elegans
Two common scales and one aberrant scale (left) – after Nicholls and Dürrschmidt, 1985
Raphidiophrys elegans
Raphidiophrys cf. elegans, solitary form
Recent posts

Penardochlamys arcelloides

P. arcelloides – from Penard, 1904 Penardochlamys arcelloides  (Penard, 1904) Deflandre, 1953 Diagnosis: Colorless or very slightly yellowish envelope, bag or cauldron-shaped, very thin, chitinous,

Read More »

Reticulomyxa hannae

R. hannae, plasmodium – photomicrograph Steffen Clauss Reticulomyxa hannae Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites surrounded by a very thin mucous envelope, with slowly moving plasmodia, variable

Read More »

Velamentofex saxonensis

V. saxonensis, feeding (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex saxonensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 30-95 μm, granuloreticulopodia up to 1000 μm long. with a hyaline, thin

Read More »

Velamentofex tyrolensis

V. tyrolensis (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex tyrolensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 98-125 μm, with reticulopodia up to 300 μm long, with a hyaline,

Read More »

Velamentofex berolinensis

V. berolinensis Velamentofex berolinensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 50-300 µm, with a hyaline, extremely flexible, membranous test. Nuclei numerous, 11.6-16.2 µm in diameter,

Read More »

Lieberkuehniidae

 Lieberkuehniidae  Siemensma, Holzmann, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, Clauß, Voelcker, Bettighofer, Khanipour Roshan, Walden, Dumack and Pawlowski, 2020 Diagnosis: Multinucleate organic-walled monothalamous foraminifera. Test very flexible, elongated to broadly

Read More »