Microworld

world of amoeboid organisms

Menu

Turriplaca biparta (Nicholls, 2013)

Diagnosis: Cells spherical, 8-12 um in diameter, covered with both plate- and spine-scales (visible in high magnification, phase contrast light microscopy). Movement is a very slow tumbling action mediated by several fine filopodia about 2 times the cell diameter in length. Plate scales circular to occasionally slight elliptical, 1.7-3.5 µm in diameter (most commonly 2.5-3 µm in diameter) with a slightly thickened rim about 0.8 µm wide. Proximal surface of plate-scales concave, lacking ornamentation; distal surface convex with 3-7 circular holes 0.15-0.25 µm in diameter. Spine-scales in two parts; the basal portion, about 2/5 of the total scale length, consists of a circular base-plate 1.0-1.2 µm in diameter from which arises a sub-cylindrical (weakly hour-glass-shaped) tube of about 0.7 µm diameter in the slightly constricted mid-region. This structure terminates in a flared apex with 3-6 marginal “teeth”. The longer apical portion consists of a sub-cylindrical shaft (slightly constricted in the mid-region) with a mid-section diameter of about 0.3 µm and with 2-3 longitudinal ribs that terminate at the apex in 2-3 small tooth-like projections. Total spine-scale length, 3.0-6.5 µm (most commonly, 4-5 µm).

Ecology: Marine. Benthic near-shore sand, north shore, Sable Island, (Atlantic Ocean, Nova Scotia); Salinity = 33 ppt; collected 20 August, 2007.

Remarks: Plate-scales of T. biparta bear some resemblance to those of Pinaciophora rubicunda (Hertwig & Lesser, 1874) Roijackers & Siemensma, 1988, Thomseniophora paucipora and P. tasmanica, Croome. P. rubicunda, however, has larger and predominantly elliptical scales with much larger and more plentiful centrally located pores on the distal surface. The plate-scales of T. biparta are larger with larger and differently arranged central pores than those of either T. paucipora or T. tasmanica. The highly characteristic bipartite spine-scales of T. biparta are very unlike those of any previously described rotosphaerid species.

from Nicholls, 2013
Recent posts

Penardochlamys arcelloides

P. arcelloides – from Penard, 1904 Penardochlamys arcelloides  (Penard, 1904) Deflandre, 1953 Diagnosis: Colorless or very slightly yellowish envelope, bag or cauldron-shaped, very thin, chitinous,

Read More »

Reticulomyxa hannae

R. hannae, plasmodium – photomicrograph Steffen Clauss Reticulomyxa hannae Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites surrounded by a very thin mucous envelope, with slowly moving plasmodia, variable

Read More »

Velamentofex saxonensis

V. saxonensis, feeding (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex saxonensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 30-95 μm, granuloreticulopodia up to 1000 μm long. with a hyaline, thin

Read More »

Velamentofex tyrolensis

V. tyrolensis (photomicrograph Steffen Clauss) Velamentofex tyrolensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 98-125 μm, with reticulopodia up to 300 μm long, with a hyaline,

Read More »

Velamentofex berolinensis

V. berolinensis Velamentofex berolinensis Völcker and Clauß, 2020 Diagnosis: Trophozoites ovoid, 50-300 µm, with a hyaline, extremely flexible, membranous test. Nuclei numerous, 11.6-16.2 µm in diameter,

Read More »

Lieberkuehniidae

 Lieberkuehniidae  Siemensma, Holzmann, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, Clauß, Voelcker, Bettighofer, Khanipour Roshan, Walden, Dumack and Pawlowski, 2020 Diagnosis: Multinucleate organic-walled monothalamous foraminifera. Test very flexible, elongated to broadly

Read More »